
UK and U.S. economic prosperity deal takes effect – Key takeaways
Hogan Lovells' annual Brands Seminar returned to Atlantic House on Thursday 3 July, bringing together clients, journalists, academics and legal experts to examine how agentic AI is reshaping the role of trade marks in consumer decision-making and how the law might change to react to this shift in purchasing behaviour
Guest speaker, Professor Dev Saif Gangjee (University of Oxford), discussed the future of “agentic AI”, where algorithms, not humans, will make purchasing decisions on behalf of consumers. He commented that trade marks have traditionally functioned as heuristic shortcuts for consumers, and asked what happens when AI can access all the product data directly. If machines don’t need brand cues, does the trade mark lose relevance? Drawing on marketing theory, psychology, and recent case law, Professor Gangjee suggested we may be moving towards a hybrid AI-human consumer, and that while “we’re not at the death of the trade mark,” he said, “something interesting is going on.”
Prior to Professor Gangjee’s exploration of the role of the trade mark in an agentic AI world, the Hogan Lovells IP team, Sahira Khwaja, Alastair Shaw, Emily Sharkey, Grace Gladdle, Laura Alvarez Otero, and Andrea Constantine, primed the audience on relevant principles arising from UK case law in Swatch v Samsung, Thom Browne v adidas, and Iconix v Dream Pairs, in particular raising questions about post-sale confusion, AI-driven recommendations, and the future of consumer perception.
Key themes from the Seminar included:
The Seminar concluded with a lively Q&A, with discussion turning to copyright, service marks, and what brand protection looks like in an AI-mediated world.
Authored by Liam Pape and Benjamin Goh.